Somebody reconnected with me on Facebook this week, and it brought to mind a couple of amusing anecdotes from childhood involving them – from either end of the compulsory educational spectrum, and both involving the person in question being the butt of a bit of a (mostly harmless) prank. I’m sure that outside of these two isolated moments we as friends were a lot kinder, but recollecting them made me smile.
The first story happened towards the end of Primary School. We were on a school trip to Whitby, staying in a large hotel (called the Morningside Hotel if memory serves). They were serving us breakfast and one of my friends kept asking for more rounds of toast and presenting them to the unfortunate lad, before ordering additional racks of toast – leaving the poor victim surrounded by racks and racks of toast. Deeply childish, yet still oddly amusing.
Fast-forward now right through to – I think – the fourth or most-likely fifth year of secondary school. Now, this might seem alien, but our school had only just set up a network of computers in a computer lab. They were Acorn Archimedes – a step up from the BBC Micros that we had formerly learned on. They had what seemed like the amazing 3D game ‘Lander‘ for a start (which I could never achieve and successful landing on!!).
Anyway, I digress – basically, this was our first real exposure to the concept of computers being connected to one another – it seems like an odd situation to be in given the ubiquitous nature of the Internet and home networks which I imagine kids are aware of the basics of from an early age now. Anyway, demonstrating what I suppose was the formative moments of my ongoing fascination with computers and networks, a friend and I were exploring.
Working through the innards of the systems – not really listening to the teacher – eventually we hit the jackpot we were seeking. I’m not sure how, as hadn’t experienced MSN or ICQ or any kind of computer-based ‘chat’ – but we found the pop-up messenger type application, and managed to decode the naming convention of all the computers on the network. I can’t remember whose idea it was, I’m going to say it was my friend’s, but it still makes me chuckle to think of it.
I don’t think through any long term vendetta, just by chance, it was the same lad who ended up with the toast who was our ‘victim’. He was sensibly working on what he should have been doing (which might well have been the reason for the selection – he was concentrating and not messing around). We selected his computer ID and typed a message – it wasn’t particularly complex or well thought-out – and for some reason, part of it had a Mexican lilt suggested in it.
His computer beeped, and on the screen a box appeared saying “Hello Meester <Surname>” – I can remember the probably exaggerated-in-my-memory pause and look of confusion, then the hastily discussed plans back at our workstation that we should continue the pretence the computer itself was trying to engage him in conversation. Unfortunately the fact that the chap in question wasn’t daft, and that my friend and I were convulsing with laughter at what we thought to be an ingenious prank cut our fledgling plans short.
Ah, memories. I wonder what children do these days to fuel that spirit of discovery – or do they just abuse each other on Facebook?
Looking on the internet there’s quite a few instances of a ‘sticky home button’ with iPhones, and as with all such things, lots of solutions! The home button is of course the staple control method so takes a lot of hammer in general use. Mine had started to become quite unresponsive – albeit not all the time – but increasingly so. An unresponsive home button renders an iPhone rather useless, so it’s a real frustration.

I had another one of those ‘did I imagine that?’ flashbacks to childhood. This time Google bore out plenty of contemporary references to it, so it’s not just me. For us it was a staple of Primary School aged birthday parties, for others it seems to have even been a playground game (who needs extra playground games when you can play British Bulldog?!)…


I had a fiddle around with the ‘
Further limitation of iTunes Match which will hopefully undergo a rethink as Apple update and evolve the admittedly fledgeling service. Users of iTunes and space-precious iDevices will probably be familiar with the handy setting of ‘convert higher bitrate songs to 128kbps’. It allows for you to maximise the limited storage on your iPhone or iPod without compromising your local library.
I’ve found telly more and more unsettling lately – having a bonus week away from the office saw me drawn occasionally into the murky world of daytime TV. A trip to see my granny exposed me to the horror that is ‘Dickinson’s Real Deals’ whilst occasionally the likes of ‘Deal or No Deal’ find their way on to the telly, indeed, Channel 4’s latest quiz offering ‘The Bank Job’ is currently reaching its’ grand finalé as I type and I’ve found it strangely compelling.

I’m not sure how many people are as anal as me about their iTunes libraries – in particular, there is something that quakes me to my very core if I know some tracks don’t have album artwork. Using my iPhone in the car as a music player I’ve been known to pull over to make a note of errant tracks to fix when I get home. Probably a bit of OCD or something, who knows?
I was quite excited by iTunes Match. A kind gift of iTunes vouchers from Cat’s parents and I invested – the idea of being able to ‘upgrade’ music matched with the iTunes database to 256kbps versions was appealing – as well as having a centralised store of my music in ‘The Cloud’ so to speak.
Recent Comments